This issue came up where I work recently because a client wanted it. This immediately triggered a discussion about the best way to get the client to change their mind.
As we all know, Comic Sans is a bad font and must never be used. But why is it a bad font? Why do clients ask all the time? What is a 'bad font' anyway?
One of the reasons people ask for it is that they like it. And one of the reasons that they like it is this:
There is nothing wrong with Comic Sans.
There, I have said it.
Complete rubbish. The vast majority of websites use Arial or Times New Roman. So overused are these fonts that people become blind to them. And when they do notice, they cite it as evidence of how good the fonts must be.
For what? So it might not be a masterpiece of kerning. But it is very readable. Call be old fashioned, but I like what I read to be readable.
By far the feeblest complaint. All fonts have a lower resolution limit. Sans-serif fonts generally do better at low resolutions.
Comic Sans was designed to imitate the clear handwritten lettering found in the speech bubbles of comic. The rounded strokes look friendly and informal. The resemblance to the lettering you saw when you first learned to write makes it highly readable.
If this font is misused, it is because of the lack of better alternatives.
Indeed there are. Hundreds.
But none of them are among the so called 'core fonts' that are installed on the vast majority of computers. CSS solves the problem of font availability by allowing you to specify backup choices for the fonts you want to use. So no matter how good the fonts you want to use are, you will still need fonts like Comic Sans as a safety net.
Labels: web design
Subscribe to
Posts [Atom]